1998 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mazda 626 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 626 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2601 mm |
