1998 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda 626 | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 626 | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |