1998 Mazda 626 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 365 kg more than 1998 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda 626 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 626 | ATS |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2776 mm |