1998 Mazda Levante vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Mazda Levante is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda Levante (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Levante should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda Levante weights approximately 90 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda Levante (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda Levante will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Levante | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Levante | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2700 mm |