1998 Mazda Midge vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda Midge (67 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda Midge weights approximately 6 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Midge | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
Model | Midge | 312 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |