1998 Mazda Midge vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda Midge (67 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda Midge weights approximately 206 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mazda Midge | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | Midge | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
