1998 Mazda Midge vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 360 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Midge | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Midge | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |