1998 Mazda Midge vs. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,452 cc, 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 134 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Midge | 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Midge | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1998 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1452 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |