1998 Mazda Midge vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (225 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Midge. (67 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 554 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (325 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Midge | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Midge | Camry |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |