1998 Mazda Midge vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Midge | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | Midge | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |