1998 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Midge.

Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Midge. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1998 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1998 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: