1998 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Midge. (67 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus RX weights approximately 1084 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda Midge | 2010 Lexus RX | |
Make | Mazda | Lexus |
Model | Midge | RX |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |