1998 Mazda MPV vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda MPV (146 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1998 Mazda MPV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mazda MPV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda MPV | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MPV | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2490 mm |