1998 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mazda RX-7 | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | RX-7 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 38 L |
