1998 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1965 Steyr 650T
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (280 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1965 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (315 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda RX-7 | 1965 Steyr 650T | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | RX-7 | 650T |
Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1850 mm |