1998 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (280 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 496 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda RX-7 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | RX-7 | 102 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |