1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1950 Mercury Roadster
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Mercury Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Mercury Roadster would be higher. At 3,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Mercury Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Mercury Roadster (108 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Mercury Roadster should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Mercury Roadster weights approximately 830 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 1950 Mercury Roadster | |
| Make | MCC | Mercury |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2960 mm |
