1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | MCC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 3130 mm |
