1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Celica weights approximately 305 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Celica |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2510 mm |
