1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Toyota Mark II (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 475 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1977 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2590 mm |
