1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1980 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 988 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Cherry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Cherry weights approximately 55 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Cherry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 1980 Nissan Cherry | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Cherry |
Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2400 mm |