1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 1990 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Sable weights approximately 680 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 1990 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | MCC | Mercury |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Sable |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2700 mm |
