1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota ES 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2320 mm |
