1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR weights approximately 280 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | MCC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2680 mm |
