1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | MCC | Holden |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
