1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 992 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Condor |
Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 22.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 70 L |