1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saturn Outlook weights approximately 612 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (361 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | MCC | Saturn |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Outlook |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 83 L |