1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2010 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2010 Mercury Milan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Milan weights approximately 971 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2010 Mercury Milan | |
Make | MCC | Mercury |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Milan |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.8 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 64 L |