1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | MCC | Peugeot |
| Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 207 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 121 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 50 L |
