1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cee'd (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 638 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | MCC | Kia |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 77.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.3:1 |
Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 17.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 53 L |