1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 993 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | MCC | Chevrolet |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Equinox |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 71 L |