1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1047 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera weights approximately 570 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | MCC | Koenigsegg |
Model | Smart & Pulse City Coupe | Agera |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 1100 HP |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 17.2 seconds | 2.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2660 mm |