1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 783 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (259 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.

Compare all specifications:

1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make MCC Cadillac
Model Smart & Pulse City Coupe ATS
Year Released 1998 2013
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 599 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 53 HP 199 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 259 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 63.5 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 63 mm 101 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 720 kg 1503 kg
Vehicle Length 2510 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1895 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1421 mm
Wheelbase Size 1820 mm 2775 mm
Fuel Consumption 4.2 L/100km 6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 5.8 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 22 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]