1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1874 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.

Compare all specifications:

1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
Make MCC Cadillac
Model Smart & Pulse City Coupe ESCALADE
Year Released 1998 2013
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 599 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 53 HP 397 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 565 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 63.5 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 63 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.4
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Seats 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 720 kg 2594 kg
Vehicle Length 2510 mm 5144 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 2007 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1928 mm
Wheelbase Size 1820 mm 2947 mm
Fuel Consumption 4.2 L/100km 13 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 5.8 L/100km 18 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 4.8 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 22 L 98 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]