1998 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz A would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1998 Mercedes-Benz A. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercedes-Benz A.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mercedes-Benz A. (130 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mercedes-Benz A.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz A | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chrysler |
Model | A | 200 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.3 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |