1998 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 640 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz C | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | C | 102 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2160 mm |
