1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM would be higher. At 5,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM.
Because 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | CLK LM | C30 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 664 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
