1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 595 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
Model | CLK | Phantom |
Year Released | 1998 | 1950 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 5673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 164 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1860 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3690 mm |