1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1959 Volvo 120. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1959 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 270 kg more than 1959 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Volvo 120. (115 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | 120 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 995 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |