1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 255 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | CLK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1998 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 5798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1520 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |