1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1992 Volvo 245
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 245. (116 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (190 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 245. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1992 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | 245 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |