1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 234 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (185 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK has manual transmission. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CLK | C 52 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2830 mm |