1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2004 BMW 320
To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 BMW 320. (168 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 320. (210 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2004 BMW 320 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | BMW |
Model | CLK | 320 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 210 Nm |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |