1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C30. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C30.
Because 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C30. (240 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | C30 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |