1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher.
Because 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | CLK | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
