1998 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 7,410 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (612 HP) has 464 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (848 Nm) has 528 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz E | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | E | Epica |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7410 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 612 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 848 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
