1998 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 7,410 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (612 HP) has 341 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (271 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (848 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (600 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz E | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jaguar |
| Model | E | XF |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7410 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 612 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 848 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |
