1998 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1970 Rover 3.5
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 7,253 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (582 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 433 more horse power than 1970 Rover 3.5. (149 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1970 Rover 3.5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 415 kg more than 1970 Rover 3.5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (721 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1970 Rover 3.5 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | ML | 3.5 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7253 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 582 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 721 Nm | 276 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2820 mm |