1998 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1956 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (204 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1956 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1956 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 200 kg more than 1956 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 1956 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1956 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1956 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
Model | SL | T 26 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 2799 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |