1998 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (389 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 351 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 1418 kg more than 1964 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (570 Nm) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | SL | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5987 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 389 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 58 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 38 L |
